Completeness of data from Cuban National Cancer Registry 2015-2019

Authors

Keywords:

Cancer Registries, Validity, Data quality

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of cancer registry data is essential for ensuring the accuracy of incidence rates. Validity, one of the quality dimensions, is the proportion of cases with a given characteristic that truly have the attribute.

Objective: to evaluate the validity of the National Cancer Registry data in 2015-2019 according to the province of residence and main locations.

Methods: a descriptive study was conducted using two of the most important indicators of validity: the proportion of cases with histological verification and those reported only by death certificate, by year of diagnosis, province of residence, and main location.

Results: histological verification was 75.3%, with better results in Villa Clara, Guantánamo, and the Special Municipality of Isla de la Juventud. Bronchus and Lung, Colon and Prostate cancer showed values lower than 70 %. Cases reported only by death certificate were 17.8 %, with higher values for Bronchus and Lung, Colon and Prostate, and Ciego de Avila, Las Tunas, and Granma.

Conclusions: the histological verification showed values close to the international standard for the whole period; however, the decrease across all provinces indicated incompleteness. This behavior was worse for Bronchus and Lung, Colon, and Prostate cancer. The percentage of cases reported only by death certificate showed results above international standards for the entire period. These results suggest underreporting of cases, more pronounced in the bronchi and in the lung, Colon, and Prostate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1- Gracia Medina EA. Registro Nacional de Cáncer, información necesaria. Rev Cub Oncol [revista en Internet]. 2020 [citado 23 Feb 2025]; 18 (3). Disponible en: https://revoncologia.sld.cu/index.php/onc/article/view/66

2- Piñeros M, Abriata MG, Mery L, Bray F. Cancer registration for cancer control in Latin America: a status and progress report. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017;41:e2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.2

3- Mery L, Bray F. Population-based cancer registries: a gateway to improved surveillance of non-communicable diseases. Ecancer medicals cience. 2020;14:. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.ed95

4- Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. Manual de Procedimientos Registro Nacional de Cáncer. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas, 2023.

5- Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747-755. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.032

6- Bray F, Colombet M, Aitken JF, Bardot A, Eser S, Galceran J, et al. editors 2023. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. XII (IARC CancerBase No. 19). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available from: https://ci5.iarc.who.int.

7- Bray F, Znaor A, Cueva P, Korir A, Swaminathan R, Ullrich A, et al. Planning and Developing Population-Based Cancer Registration in Low- or Middle-Income Settings. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33502836

8- Hofferkamp JE. Standards for Cancer Registries. Volume III: Standards for Completeness, Quality, Analysis, Management, Security and Confidentiality of Data. Springfield (IL). North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. 2008.

9- Martos C, Crocetti E, Visser O, Rous B, Giusti F, and the Cancer Data Quality Checks Working Group. A proposal on cancer data quality checks: one common procedure for European cancer registries– version 1.1. 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/429053

10- Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756-764. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033

11- Bray F, Ferlay J. Chapter 5: data comparability and quality. In: Cancer Incidence in Five Continents volume XI. 2021. IARC Scientific Publication No. 166. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.

12- Mendoza-García O, Redondo-Sánchez D, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Sánchez MJ. Incidencia de cáncer en la provincia de Granada, 2017-2019 [Internet]. Granada: Registro de Cáncer de Andalucía en la provincia de Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, CIBERESP, ibs.GRANADA. Consejería de Salud y Consumo, Junta de Andalucía; 2024. Disponible en: https://www.registrocancergranada.es/

13- Leinonen MK, Miettinen J, Heikkinen S, Pitkäniemi J, Malila N. Las medidas de calidad del Registro Finlandés de Cáncer, de base poblacional, indican una sólida calidad de los datos sobre tumores malignos sólidos. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 77:31–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.017

14- Larsen IK, Smastuen M, Johannesen TB, Langmark F, Parkin DM, Bray F, et al. Calidad de los datos en el Registro de Cáncer de Noruega: resumen de la comparabilidad, integridad, validez y actualidad. Eur J Cancer, 2009;45(7):1218–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037

15- Ryzhov A, Bray F, Ferlay J, Fedorenko Z, Goulak L, Gorokh Y, et al. Evaluación de la calidad de los datos en el Registro Nacional de Cáncer de Ucrania. Cancer Epidemiol, 2018; 53:156–65. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.02.002

16- Wéber A, Mery L, Nagy P, Polgár C, Bray F, Kenessey I. Evaluación de la calidad de los datos en el Registro Nacional de Cáncer de Hungría, 2000-2019. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 82:102306. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2022.102306

17- Giusti F, Martos C, Negrão Carvalho R, Van Eycken L, Visser O, Bettio M. Quality indicators: completeness, validity and timeliness of cancer registry data contributing to the European Cancer Information System. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1219128. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1219128

18- Garau MN, Alonso R, Musetti C, Barrios E. Incidencia y mortalidad de cáncer en Uruguay: 2013-2017. Colomb Méd (Cali), 2022; 53(1):e2014966 doi.org/10.25100/cm.v53i1.4966

19- Cueva P. Tarupi W.Caballero H. Incidencia y mortalidad por cáncer en Quito: información para monitorear las políticas de control del cáncer. Colomb Méd (Cali), 2022; 53(1):e2024929 doi.org/10.25100/cm.v53i1.4929

20- Iglesias Ventura Y. Calidad de los datos del Registro Nacional de Cáncer de Cuba 2015-2019 [Tesis de Maestría]. La Habana: Facultad de Tecnología de la Salud.2025 (tesis no publicada)

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

1.
Iglesias Ventura YIV, Galán Alvarez YH, López Chacón A, Fernández Garrote LM, Breto Peña A. Completeness of data from Cuban National Cancer Registry 2015-2019. Rev Cub Oncol [Internet]. 2026 May 5 [cited 2026 May 6];22:e101162. Available from: https://revoncologia.sld.cu/index.php/onc/article/view/101162

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.